Teaching Excellence

Another excellent Edublogs.org weblog

Guided Instruction

Posted by marcschulz on December 17, 2010

Guided Instruction

It has been twelve weeks since I have been purposely implementing all 4 steps of the Gradual Release into my lesson plans. Although it has not always been perfect, it has proven to be a very effective framework. Initially it forced me to think differently when planning; what is my role? What is the students’ role? What strategies can I use to increase collaboration, comprehension, and assessment? Now, a trimester later, I am seeing the impact it is having upon classroom management, student interaction, and student performance.

However there are times that I have trouble fitting it all in during a period and I need to make adjustments. I also have struggled at times distinguishing between “guided instructions” and “collaboratively learning”. I will attempt to address both of these issues in hopes that it will assist others as they go through the process of implementing the GRR.

Recently I spent some time reading Fisher and Frey’s “Better Learning; Through Structured Teaching” a quick and easy read about the GRR Framework. Each portion of the GRR is discussed separately highlighting what it is, what it is not, and providing examples. From my reading I formed some new understanding of the guided instruction portion of the GRR. I have been doing most of my guided instruction as a whole class and although this isn’t bad thing I learned that guided instruction is very effective in small groups. I also learned that the guided instruction does not need to be a separate piece but can be part of the collaborative group work time.

This made a lot of sense because it is very common and quite often necessary to visit each group during the collaborative piece of the lesson, providing the opportunity to offer guidance and support. While the majority of the students are working together, differentiation with students who were absent or are struggling with a particular concept can take place in a separate small group. Combining these two steps together makes for a more efficient use of classroom time.

During the guided practice the teacher is to assist the student in scaffolding or bridging old knowledge to new knowledge.   This is done through questioning; what do you think it is? Why do you think that? What proof or evidence do you have to support that thinking? What resources do you have that might help? Posing these questions to a small group rather than an individual or even a whole class allows for social learning and the building of social networks. This will deepen learning, make school more enjoyable and build college and job readiness skills.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Reality Strikes

Posted by marcschulz on December 17, 2010

Reality Strikes

As I stood in front of the class today I had flashbacks to my earlier days of teaching when I felt like I was alone in the classroom. As I tried to give the lesson a purpose and direction the students just stared back with an empty gaze. When I  asked them to share with one another there was silence. As I looked at the clock expecting that only a few minutes had passed, based upon where we were at in the lesson, I was astonished to realize that half the class was over and we were still on the intro information. Worse yet, it became apparent that the student had retained very little from the previous three lessons. Agggh! how could this be happening, after all I feel like I am master teacher that has many tools to use. We just finished a trimester in which I saw my classes evolve in taking notes, learning how to ask questions, comprehending the textbook, and most importantly learning through collaboration. My classes were large and filled with “good” noise. So what has happened? It must be the students? The weather? Maybe its the Holidays? I must face reality, I made some errors.

How could I have overlooked the importance of building a culture in the classroom. I did not take the time on the first two days of class to discuss, model, and provide practice using our Social Contract and the techniques students need to support one another.

The next mistake involves the productive group work and my expectations. I have to remember the groups that finished strong at the end of the first trimester did not start strong. In fact, we spent a lot of time learning how to work as a group, assume roles, communicate with one another, and work towards a common final product. I mistakenly expected this to carry over to second trimester but I need to realize the dynamics are different and forming groups is a process.

Finally, I have not been making the time to start class with handshakes and celebrations. Neither  build content knowledge and both consume precious time. However the engagement and exploration with the students undoubtedly sets the tone for the classroom and provides opportunity to model the social contract and techniques that the students need to support the classroom.

What did I learn? In this case nothing new but rather a strong reminder. Creating the right classroom expectations, modeling group behavior, and building relationships may take valuable content time but it will lead to deeper and richer learning over time.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Productive Group Work Catholic Central

Posted by marcschulz on October 23, 2010

This past week, along with Mark Kasmer, I had the opportunity to share our (Sparta’s) understanding of Productive Group Work with teachers of the Catholic School System. The information we shared was largely based upon the work of Doug Fisher and Nancy Frey, but we also shared from our own experiences. It is this latter part that got me reflecting upon my own application of productive group work; What have I been doing well? What can I be doing better? What is one thing I can do next week?

As I discussed the tenets of Productive Group Work (Positive Interdependence, Face to Face Interaction, Indvidual and Group Accountability, Interpersonal and Small Group Skills, Group Processing, and a Meaningful Task) I realized that the small groups in my classroom are beginning to comunicate with one another using the language that we are modeling; What is it that we need to do? Who has this part? I think it is…, maybe we shoud… This is an example of strong Face to Face Interaction and an improving Interpersonal and Small Group Skills. I believe modeling active listening and providing role cards that describe the position and provide examples of statements has had a direct positive impact in these two areas. Although there is room for improvement in group processing, the application of this tenet has also led to improved productivity.

Some of the tenets that stuck out to me as areas that need attention would be Positive Interepence and  Individual and Group Accoutability. I believe the latter is a matter of improving a way to track the groups academic and social improvements.Perhaps a form that is completed by the students which includes attendance, work completed and a daily individual performance grade would suffice. It is the former tenet that is the toughest one for me. I have found that this takes intentional planning and preparation. And just over the last week or two I have been trying to do this, the result have been mixed. I am not sure yet if the content purpose has been impacted but have noticed an increase in group discussion. I have no doubt that eventually this increase discussion will lead to increased understanding.

I know that one of the best ways to learn something is to teach it and this idea proved to be true again. As mentioned earlier I struggle with providing activites to create Positive Interdepence, but as the paprticipants read and discussed portion of Fisher’s Productive Group Work I heard discussion aboput an activity called “numbered heads”. I knew of this activity but never uesd it and therefore forgot about it. There it was, a simple activity that would increase positive interdependence. This reminded me of another activity called Cube It that would do the same thing. In the midst of presenting the power of collaboration I reaped the rewards of it.

So when I go back to the classroom this week there are two ideas or things that I will be focusing on. First I am going to be looking for areas in my lesson plans to use Cube it and Numbered Heads. I expect both will continue to grow the social aspect of the group and I am hopeful they will also demonstrate an increase interdependence. Evidence of this will be seen in an increase of understanding as assessed both formatively and summatively. The second thing I would like to do this week is to create a “Group Performace Tracking Chart” that will increase the Individual and Group Accountability of all group work. This chart should be designed to be completed, tracked, and kept by the students. Evidence of its effectiveness will include appropriate grade differences amongst students and an increase in the groups performance/productivity.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Neural Basis for Productive Group Work

Posted by marcschulz on May 19, 2010

This is a progressive writing created by the participants of our morning book club.  The topic “Neural Basis for Productive GroupWork,  A Summary this Morning’s Learning”.  There is a twist as well – you are to limit your comment to three sentences.

Summary:

Doug Fisher and his colleagues have discussed the necessity of group work to promote learning in the text that we are reading. To help apply this concept they have shared instructional strategies as well as “real” stories from the classroom of Northview Public Schools. Unlike many other books I have read, this one discusses biological evidence of activity within the brain that occurs when one is a member of a productive group.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Round Table

Posted by marcschulz on March 16, 2010

 

Round Table

> We would offer United Way and Family Literacy from 1:15 to 1:45 and Grandville Elementary and Middle and Sparta High School and Alternative High School from 1:45 to 2:15. These “Roundtables” are low tech sharing and discussion opportunities. You will probably have around 15 to 20 members in your “Roundtable”.

 

Literacy In Sparta
> Come hear what Sparta is doing to create a common focus on using literacy in all subjects throughout the district. We (Ken Willison and I) will discuss the transparent and transportable instructional tools, > the implementation of PD to use the tools, and the impacts we are seeing. We will also share the bumps in the road and how we hope to utilize the Literacy Coach to support the district initiatives.

About Me

I have been teaching for 14 years, the last nine have been in Sparta. All of which have been in the alternative ed.

I am a Science teacher who by chance discovered the power of Literacy across all contents.

Three and half years ago our district decided to add a new DSI Committee called Content Literacy, I asked to join (Science was not fulfilling). That summer I received a phone call from our assistant superintendent, the call was regarding a reference check, afterwards he asked if I would be willing to give up some of my last days of vacation to help with the District opener PD – Marzanos. I of course agreed. Looking back it was the best thing that happened to me professionally.

I became co-chair of Content Literacy two years ago.

Sparta

Transparency  and transportable research based teaching strategies and tools. CKH, Content Literacy and GRR

 

What We Did

3years ago we introduced Marzano’s 6 Steps to Teaching Vocabulary. District wide PD was accepted fairly well but staff was overwhelmed with building moves, etc. Therefore we heard many complaints about time , etc.

What we learned

To show patience on our behalf, but to stay the course. We also realized that we needed to sell this as a tool to make teaching more efficient, rather then one more thing to squeeze in.

What We Did

 Year Two- We stuck with the 6 Step model, revisited it district wide by asking all admin to add discussion about it at each staff meeting. We also asked our committee members to present or find someone to present a part of each step at the staff meetings.

What We Learned

We learned that some of our own Committee members were not confident with the material and therefore were not comfortable with helping others. So we strengthened within the community and also reached out for other staff. We also found that there needed to be admin support to keep the 6 Steps out there and give it validity. We also learned that it was important to all0o staff to have some say in the next PD.

What We Did

 This year, the Content Literacy Committee spearheaded the district opening PD and offered 10 Reading and Writing to Learn strategies for secondary (elementary continued their work on Reading and Writing for Comprehension. There were 10 breakout sessions, staff were able to pick six. In district did the training. We made sure that this was in addition to the 6 Steps. We also provided staff with a 3-3-3 activity to serve as a self accountability and building accountability.

What We Learned

We used a survey at the end of the PD to get immediate feedback. The feedback was positive, staff is buying into the content lit committee. With that said after a mid-year pd we received a strong message to slow down. Teachers liked what was being presented but now wanted time to master it.

What’s Next

Review of the ten strategies presented this past year. Slowly we will begin to introduce Gradual Release or Responsibility, a transparent instructional format.

In addition to myself we have several Cohort II Literacy Coaches in Sparta. It is the districts hope that the Literacy coaches will be able to find release time to support the teachers and these initiatives.

Hurdles

 

Time, Keeping things fresh, accountability.

Three things to wrap up with

Teacher driven and teacher taught pd

Acoountability

Sell it as tool(s) or service that will add to effectiveness not another thing to squeeze in.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Relearning Capturing Kids Heart

Posted by marcschulz on December 3, 2009

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Curriculum Vitae

Posted by marcschulz on November 9, 2009

Marc Schulz

904 Bellclaire Ave SE

East Grand Rapids, MI 49506

616-485-5101 (cell)

marc.schulz@staff.spartaschools.org

Professional Profile

An organized individual that fulfills his commitments with enthusiasm and dependability. A highly motivated leader and role model who is successful in conveying the vision, mission, and values of an organization and demonstrates passion for continued professional development. A skilled team player and rapport builder that embraces the power of synergy with co-workers and students.

Academic Background

Kent Intermediate School District, Grand Rapids, Michigan

  • Literacy Coaches Network – Present

The Flippen Group at KISD, Grand Rapids, MI

  • Certificate of Completion – Process Champions – 2010
  • Certificate of Completion – Capturing Kids Hearts – 2009
  • Certificate of Completion – CKH Teen Leadership Instructor - 2009

Adams State College, Colorado

  • Completion of  3 Credits; US-Satellite – ACES/Signals of Spring – 2008 to 2009

Kent Intermediate School District, Grand Rapids, Michigan

  • Certificate of Completion – Discovering the Leader Within – 2007 to 2008

University of St. Thomas, Minnesota

  • Completion of 6 Credits; Science by Inquiry (3), What Great Principals Do (3), 2007
  • Completion of 3 Credits, Performance-based Assessment (3), 2008

Aquinas College, Grand Rapids, Michigan

  • Masters in Management, 2003
  • Emphasis on organizational leadership and group dynamics.

Ferris State University, Big Rapids, Michigan

  • Certificate of Teaching, 1997
  • Dean’s List Spring of 1997

Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania

  • Bachelor of Science/Liberal Arts, 1994
  • 4-yr Varsity Letter – Men’s NCAA Volleyball

Professional Licenses/Certifications

Michigan Secondary Professional Education Certificate

  • Biology (DA) 6-12
  • Science (DX) 6-12

Teaching Experience

Sparta Area School – Englishville High School

Lead Teacher                                                                                                                            2010-present

  • Implement district iniatives building wide; Capturing Kids Heart, Common Instructional Framework – Gradual release of Responsibility, Common Instructional Strategies of Content Literacy
  • Created Academic Support Model
  • Participant in long-term planning
  • Day to day operations

Sparta Area Schools – Englishville High School                                             2000 – 2010

Science Teacher in Alternative Ed

  • Use of 5-E Lesson Plan (engage, explore, explain, evaluate, and elaborate) to encourage inquiry learning.
  • Currently building a curriculum/lesson plan wiki (pbwiki.com) of all units taught.
  • Creation of class bogs (Edublog.com) to post lecture notes.
  • Developed the Experiential Education program that promoted leadership, decision-making, and team working skills.
  • Designed and implemented the Critical Thinking class to encourage students to think in the higher order domain.

Synergy Program – Newaygo Public Schools                                                   1996 – 2000

Teacher in Day Treatment Program

  • Lead a Self-contained classroom for Newaygo County adjudicated youth ages 12-18.
  • Worked daily with social worker and activity specialist to develop curriculum to meet the needs of the students and families that were involved in the program.
  • Completed numerous multi-day wilderness trips that served as a backbone to the program.
  • Organized and implemented Loomis Alternative Academy’s after-school detention.

Presentations/Leadership Roles

District School Improvement Team – Co-Chair of the Content Literacy 2008 -present

  • Assisted in design and implementation of district wide professional development September 2009
  • Plan and facilitate committee meetings
  • On going communication throughout the district (preK-12)

Presenter at Sparta School District Professional Development

  • Co-developed District Opening Day PD – Reading and Writing to Learn Strategies  2010
  • Lead Book Study – Productive Group Work, Sparta Middle School 2010
  • Productive Group Work 2010
  • Think-Aloud” – Reading to Learn Tool, 2009 and 2010
  • Teaching Key Vocabulary – Marzano’s Six-Steps, 2007

Presenter at the Michigan Alternative Education Organization Conference

  • Using Marzano’s 6-Step Process to Teach Vocabulary, 2009
  • How to use Critical Thinking, 2005
  • Experiential Education, 2004

Other Presentations

  • Productive Group Work at the Grand Rapids Catholic Schools 2010
  • Round Table Discussion – Literacy Coaches Network 2010

Grants

Sparta Education Foundation

  • Native Plant Garden, Fall 2009
  • Rain Barrels, 2009
  • Student At-Need Scholarships for Chicago Trip – 2007
  • Chicago Trip 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Personal Statement Part 2

Posted by marcschulz on November 8, 2009

Section II: (250 word maximum)
Please include the following:

 I am eager to be accepted into the NASA Endeavor Teaching Fellowship Program.  Most exciting is the opportunity to work with a mentor to develop a plan that will assess my current teaching style and adjusting it to incorporate the proven best practices of STEM Education. I will work diligently to complete all of the courses in the given time period and to use the new knowledge to improve my classroom instruction. I look forward to designing an action research study to analyze the effectiveness of the material and strategies being used in my classroom.

 I currently work in a small alternative school setting (70+ students) where I am responsible for the entire science curriculum. This autonomy enables me to adjust the curriculum in a very timely manner to accommodate the material of the Endeavor Program. To the contrary, this self-sufficiency does not afford me the opportunities for professional dialogue. Acceptance into this program will give me the chance to discuss STEM Education with other teaching professionals. I have no doubt that these future conversations will prove to be priceless for the future education of my students.

I am a regular presenter at the Annual Michigan Alternative Education Organization Conference. By selecting me, you can be assured the STEM Education Best Practices will be shared among the alternative education teachers in the state of Michigan. 

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Endeavor Program

Posted by marcschulz on October 13, 2009

My Teaching Philosophy

By Marc Schulz

The gift of learning; the ability to acquire, interpret, and use information is the greatest gift that can be given or received. For this reason I design my lessons, classroom discussions, and assessments to encourage and require critical thinking skills. Evidence that students are building a foundation to be lifelong learners is recognized when they demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate.

As Co-Chair of Sparta School District Content Literacy Committee and a Literacy Coach trainee I believe in using literacy tools.  I have found literacy tools essential for developing the vocabulary and comprehension necessary to construct meaningful knowledge. On a daily basis I use a combination of inquiry learning (5E Lesson Planning), technology, “Reading and Writing to Learn” tools, and “Best Practice” tools to create an environment that encourages students to engage themselves, ask questions, learn collaboratively and to analyze their own thinking (metacognition).

I am certified to teach Biology, General Science, Physics, Chemistry, Earth Science, and Environmental Science. Over my 14 year career I have developed most, if not all of my courses from scratch. This is not uncommon in the alternative school setting, but I believe my constant effort to align with state standards while improving my assessments, pedagogy, and knowledge separates my lessons from other Science classrooms (both traditional and alternative). With that said, I also know as far as I have come, as much as I have grown, there is still much more to learn if I am granted this opportunity. The information and instructional practices that I will acquire from the Endeavor Project will strengthen the ever-growing Science Program at Englishville Alternative High School.

A typical unit of mine will begin with assessing students’ prior knowledge and then adding prerequisite knowledge as needed. Daily formative assessments indicate when the time is right to begin scaffolding or adding new knowledge. This new knowledge may follow the content of a text or simply be self designed, but either way the main focus is to strengthen students understanding (lower order thinking). Further formative assessment; entrance and exit slips, entrance and exit text messages, self-ratings for understanding, or writing breaks will indicate when it is time to move on to the higher order domain of the unit. At this point, the student may work individually or in a small group to create a project, design and complete a lab, or write a proposal, all of which are inquiry based and challenge the critical thinking skills of the student. At the end of the unit the student will complete a two part summative assessment comprised of a traditional written test and the completion of their project. Projects may be graded with a rubric but there is special consideration taken in designing a rubric so that it does not impede the inquiry portion of the lesson.

The “Recycle, It’s the Cool Thing to do!” project is an example of an end of unit project. This will involve students working in small groups to create an audio or video/audio persuasive public announcement to encourage people to recycle. Students will brainstorm ideas, identify roles, create and implement a plan to convey the message that producing products from recycled material uses less energy and therefore recycling helps fight global warming.

As the year progresses there is a conscious effort to spiral (connect) the essential concepts from one unit to the next. For example, the Biology class completes a bacteria and virus unit during the approach of the flu season. The information they learn will be connected to other lessons and units covered later in the year; The Human Body, Microorganisms, Genetics (RNA and DNA). Linking concepts from one unit to another is necessary for constructing new knowledge and making learning meaningful.

Students learn at different rates and therefore demonstrate understanding of new knowledge at different times. Because it is my responsibility to bring each student to a point in which they can achieve the state standards, I must be willing to accept the fact that time cannot be a constraint on learning. To account for this, students are allowed to retake test and resubmit projects to demonstrate their understanding, even if it is after the official end of the marking period.  Although all students are held to the same deadlines and testing dates, those who do not meet our building criteria are given the opportunity to continue learning and to retest using a similar assessment. To make this work I provide lunch support time twice a week. During this time students can come in and receive one on one help or simply complete the learning packets that are designed to be completed as an independent lesson (much different than my typical instruction). When the packets are complete the student re-tests. By doing this, students are given an opportunity to learn and to demonstrate what they have learned. The end result allows students to recover credits that otherwise would have been lost.

If my overall goal is to create lifelong learners, I cannot allow myself to focus only on the content and the assessment of the content, but I also have to teach the student how to learn. This goes beyond critical thinking, it is the idea that there are certain skills that successful learners utilize. For example good readers do things that struggling readers do not, such as making predictions, visualizing, and making connections. For this reason, embedded in my lesson are opportunities to model to the students the skills or concepts that are associated with “successful” students. In my classroom we call the foundations of these skills the three P’s; Presence, Preparation, and Participation. In its simplest form, I model to the students that it is the mental attendance that is important to learning.  I give suggestions to how they can prepare their mind by reviewing what they learned yesterday or predicting what they may learn today. I make every effort to be prepared and challenge them to do the same. They should have the material they need, as well as the physical and mental health that is necessary for productive learning. Finally, I share with them the importance of participation and its impact on personal growth. The 3P’s is a focus of every class each day and has allowed students to make important connections between learning, purpose, and fun. 

The Gradual Release of Responsibility Framework for instructional delivery has played an important role in my classroom planning. The basic concept of the framework is the teacher will model, the teacher will give guided instruction, students will learn together (collaboratively), and then the student will demonstrate their understanding independently.  This framework allows me to incorporate the 5-e lesson planning with essential concepts and the 3P’s while building the foundation to become lifelong learners.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Need for QAR

Posted by marcschulz on October 2, 2009

QAR can be categorized as a “Reading to Learn Strategy”. Many classrooms still have students read a passage or section of a text and then assign the questions at the end of the chapter. Whether this a a good practice or a poor one is not what needs to be addressed here. In fact, much of the MME is reading and the students who can extract the information from the passages correctly will tend to score better on the test. So as classrooms move more to alternative teaching formats and away from reading materials we may just be doing the student an injustice. However simply assigning a section adnd questions is probably not getting the job done either.

 

Students need to understand theat there are four basic types of questions and answers; Right There, Think and Search, Author and You, On My Own. Knowing how to identify the type of question being asked will allow the student to be more efficient and hopefully more accurate in answering the question. For example, at the end of Chapter Nine of the Prentice Hall Biology Text there are several sections of questions. The first ten are under the title “Reviewing Content” and happen to be multiple choice. These are Right There  question because the reader can go back and find the answer stated in the text. This section is followed by “Understanding Concepts”, a quick glance will reveal that these are typically Think and Search questions. They use the language of the text and require the reader to search in several different spots to complete the answer. Quite often the aassignment stops here, afterall 22 questions can be a lot. If this is the case that you find in your classroom, try to assign every other one or every third question from the first two sections. It is important to get to the “Critical Thinking” and any other extension questions. The end questions tend to be the one that focus on Bloom’s Higher Order Domian. In the Biology Text example, the “Critical Thinking” section represents the Author and You  of QAR. The questions use language from the text but also rely upon previous knowledge and experience of the reader. Finally the text mentioned above challenges students to a Performance Based Assessment or Writing in Science assignemnt, both reflect the characteristics of On My Own types of question. Although the text is helpful it probably is not necessary for the student to complete the answer.

 

As secondary teachers we need student to know the four types of questions and how to answer them. Students need to know that Author and You  and On My Own questions may seem difficult and frustrating, but with some practice a student can become fluent in answering higher domain questions.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »